The MPC Decision: Seven Hold, Two Want 4%
The Monetary Policy Committee voted 7-2 to maintain Bank Rate at 3.75%. The two dissenters — almost certainly the external members who've been the hawkish minority since February — wanted a quarter-point rise to 4%. The minutes, published 18 June, reveal a committee split between inflation fears and growth fears, and for now, the growth fears are winning.
The Committee's core judgment hasn't changed since April: monetary policy can't influence energy prices, so hiking into an energy supply shock would be pointless — and harmful. "The policy stance required to achieve [the 2% target] will depend on the scale and duration of the shock, and how it propagates through the economy," the minutes state. Translation: we're waiting.
But the data they're waiting on is turning. CPI inflation was 2.8% in May, unchanged from April — and 0.4 percentage points below the Bank's own short-term forecast. The miss was broad-based: food, core goods, and services all came in below expectations. Food price inflation has collapsed to 2.2%, from levels above 19% during the 2023 peak. This is genuine disinflation, not just energy base effects.
On the other side: the labour market is loosening. Unemployment is 4.9%. The composite PMI fell below 50 in May — the first contraction signal in over a year. GDP grew 0.6% in Q1 but monthly GDP fell 0.1% in April. Bank staff estimate underlying quarterly growth at around 0.2% — barely above stall speed. Wage growth in the private sector slowed to 2.9%, marginally below what the Bank considers consistent with the 2% target.
Put simply: the hawks' case — that tight labour markets and rising inflation expectations would embed a wage-price spiral — is not showing up in the data. The doves' case — that a weakening economy will do the disinflationary work for them — is.
The Bank of England's official rate history now shows six consecutive holds. Next decision: 30 July. Markets now expect no change until at least November.