The 30 July Decision: 6-3, and the Cracks Are Showing
The MPC voted 6-3 to hold Bank Rate at 3.75% on 30 July — the seventh consecutive hold since December 2025. That's the headline. The subtext matters more: the majority shrank from 7-2 in June. Megan Greene, Catherine L Mann, and Huw Pill all voted for a 0.25 percentage point increase to 4%.
The hawkish trio's argument, laid out in the minutes, is worth reading in full: they "were less reassured on the underlying disinflationary process, were concerned that second-round effects could be material, and thought it relevant that inflation had exceeded the 2% target for more than five years." That last point is the one nobody wants to talk about. UK inflation has been above target since May 2021. Five years. The MPC's own credibility is now a variable in the equation.
The six-member majority — Bailey, Breeden, Dhingra, Lombardelli, Ramsden, and Taylor — argued that "little evidence of material second-round effects" had emerged so far. They're not wrong about the backward-looking data. CPI fell to 2.6% in June from higher levels earlier in the year. Services inflation is moderating. Wage growth is slowing. But the MPC's own minutes acknowledge that "given lags in pass-through, this could not be taken as a strong signal about their future emergence."
This is the core tension. The doves are voting on data that's already two months stale. The hawks are voting on where oil prices — and by extension, inflation — are going. And between 30 July and 12 August, the hawks' case has strengthened materially. Oil is up $6 a barrel. The IEA is sounding alarms. Hormuz is closed indefinitely. If the MPC voted today, would the majority still be 6-3?
For a deeper look at what this means for your borrowing costs, see our analysis: The BoE Just Held at 3.75% for the Sixth Straight Month — Your 4.66% Fixed Rate Is a Bet Against Every Signal the Market Is Sending.